BrusselsReport.eu Ranking of Members of European Parliament

May 18, 2021

EPplenary — Copyright: Copyright: "European Parliament, Strasbourg" by tacowitte is licensed under CC BY 2.0

BrusselsReport.eu is happy to present the first edition of its Ranking of Members of European Parliament, which is set to be updated regularly.

The data analysis has been provided by VoteWatch Europe.

METHODOLOGY:

MEPs are being ranked according to the perspective of BrusselsReport.eu, which, as mentioned on our website, intends to be a platform offering an alternative to the dominant EU policy consensus, thereby criticizing:

Fiscal transfers
A top-down policy approach
Loose monetary policies
Protectionism
Excessive or ill-guided regulation

Instead supporting:

Decentralisation
Hard money
Fiscal and regulatory competition
Low taxes
Free trade
Respect for the rule of law

In particular, the ranking covers how MEPs have voted when it comes to:

financial transparency (2 votes)
financial accountability (9 votes)
subsidiarity (4 votes)
civil liberties (1 vote)
free market economics (2 votes)

It is important to note that to vote against a certain proposal on the mere basis of the ideological background of the MEP that submitted the proposal, is not being considered as a valid excuse. Proposals need to be judged on their merits.

This ranking also only ranks MEPs on how they have voted on the selected votes and not on their ideology otherwise, let alone other factors (like personal behaviour).

For each vote, MEPs received:

+1 point for voting in line with the Brussels Report perspective

-1 point for voting in the opposite direction

0 points for abstention or not taking part in the vote

When the score of MEPs is a draw, MEPs are ranked on the basis of how high their participation to vote has been since the 2019 European Parliament elections.

The following 18 votes have been singled out, all of them from the April 2021 Plenary session of the European Parliament:

I. Financial transparency (2 votes)

VOTE NR 1 on an obligation for MEPs to disclose how they use their monthly “expenditure allowance” of more than 4400 euro which they receive on top of their salaries

Reference: 2019 Discharge: EU general budget – European Parliament Amendment 45/2

A majority of 355 MEPs voted to support a proposal to require MEPs to prove they are using their monthly expenditure allowance for actual office expenditure and that they are not merely pocketing the money, which amounts to more than 4400 euro per month, on top of their monthly salaries of over 8,000 euro. The issue has become the symbol of how the European Parliament, which is supposed to serve as a watchdog for the EU machinery, struggles to get its own house in order.

Transparency International has noted that along with the secretarial allowance, used by MEPs to pay their staff, amounting to €24,164 monthly per MEP, “this EU budget line has repeatedly been the subject of fraud and misuse by MEPs.”

🇬🇧 Should Members of Parliament be required to prove they are using the expenditure allowance for expenditures, rather than pocketing it? @EPPGroup and @IDGroupEP think no. ECR doesn’t know. pic.twitter.com/MaPgG8gGrF

— Patrick Breyer #JoinMastodon (@echo_pbreyer) April 30, 2021

This is the text MEPs adopted:

Highlights the fact that the 2018 Bureau decision on the general expenditure allowance stipulates that the Bureau will maintain this decision until the end of 2022 and will evaluate it on the basis of the experience gained during the 9th parliamentary term; regrets that the bureau continues to ignore the plenary’s will expressed on numerous occasions1a to further reform the general expenditure allowance, thereby actively preventing Members’ expenses of Union taxpayers’ money from becoming more transparent and accountable; urges the bureau to immediately implement the Plenary’s decisions from the 2017 and 2018 Parliament’s discharge reports introducing changes to the rules governing the general expenditure allowance; stresses that any new voluntary and/or optional measures for greater transparency and financial accountability should not create unnecessary bureaucracy for Members and their offices; _________________ 1a Discharge 2017: General budget of the EU – European Parliament, March 26th, 2019; Discharge 2018: General budget of the EU – European Parliament, May 14th, 2020.

A majority of MEPs thereby voted to change this original text:

Highlights the fact that the 2018 Bureau decision on the general expenditure allowance stipulates that the Bureau will maintain this decision until the end of 2022 and will evaluate it on the basis of the experience gained during the 9th parliamentary term; stresses that any new voluntary and/or optional measures for greater transparency and financial accountability should not create unnecessary bureaucracy for Members and their offices.

Still, a minority of 250 MEPs however voted against requiring them to prove they are using the expenditure allowance for expenditures, while 93 abstained.

To see how individual MEPs voted on this vote, please click here: How Individual MEPs voted and Vote Selection – MEP ranking Brussels Report18052021. Voting along the lines of the Brussels Report perspective is marked in green. Voting the other way, in red.

VOTE NR 2 on supporting transparency on the financing of the “Conference on the future of the Union”

Reference: 2019 Discharge: EU general budget – European Parliament Amendment 5

A majority of MEPs voted to reject transparency on the financing of the “Conference on the future of the Union”

This is the text a majority of 360 MEPs rejected. Only 329 supported the proposals, with 10 abstaining:

51 a. Notes the setting up of the Conference on the future of the Union; calls for clarification as soon as possible of the conditions for financing this conference and the consequences for the institution’s budget; calls for a commitment to full transparency on the expenditure of this conference, including the keeping of separate accounts and an audit report by the European Court of Auditors for each year of functioning.

II. Financial accountability (9 votes)

VOTE NR 3 on pledging to refuse to approve (“grant discharge to”) EU spending in case EU state aid rules are violated in the context of spending funds from the EU recovery fund

Reference: 2019 Discharge: EU general budget – Commission and executive agencies Amendment 2

This is the original text:

Recalls the increasing gap between commitments and payments and the increase in the size of the Union budget (the Court’s rapid case review, ‘Outstanding commitments – a closer look’) which poses a serious challenge for the discharge authority too; notes that the long-term EU budget increased from 1.083 to 1.800 billion Euro for 2021-2027, including the EU Recovery plan Next GenerationEU; calls on the Commission to monitor the implementation of the national recovery and resilience plans at regular intervals to ensure that the state aid rules are fulfilled and report to the discharge authority; stresses that a failure of this request could lead to a refusal of the Discharge procedure in 2020;

This is how a majority of MEPs changed it, thereby scrapping “stresses that a failure of this request could lead to a refusal of the Discharge procedure in 2020”:

“Recalls the increasing gap between commitments and payments and the increase in the size of the Union budget (the Court’s rapid case review, ‘Outstanding commitments – a closer look’) which poses a serious challenge for the discharge authority too; notes that the long-term EU budget increased from 1.083 to 1.800 billion Euro for 2021-2027, including the EU Recovery plan Next GenerationEU; calls on the Commission to monitor the implementation of the national recovery and resilience plans at regular intervals to ensure that the state aid rules are fulfilled and report to the discharge authority;”

VOTE NR 4 on whether to reduce EU agricultural subsidies in a rather modest way

Reference: 2019 Discharge: EU general budget – Commission and executive agencies Paragraph 341

The EU’s biggest spending area is still agriculture. A part of that spending, around 300 billion euro in the previous EU budget period, goes to “market related expenditure and direct payments”, whereby the link between subsidies and production of specific crops has largely been removed, in effect causing people and corporates to receive EU taxpayers money mainly for owning agricultural land. A very first step to tackling the EU’s misguided agricultural policies is of course to reduce these payments.

This is the proposal that a large majority of MEPs supported. Still, a number of MEPs rejected this:

Insists that larger farm incomes do not necessarily need the same degree of support for stabilising farm incomes as smaller farms in times of crisis in income volatility since they may benefit from potential economies of scale, which are likely to be resilient; believes that the Commission should take steps to ensure that CAP funds are distributed in a weighted manner, such that the payments per hectare are on a reducing scale relative to the size of the holding/farm[85];

VOTE NR 5 on scrapping a pledge to prevent EU funds supporting incitement to terrorism and anti-semitic hatred

Reference: 2019 Discharge: EU general budget – Commission and executive agencies Amendment 43D= 73D=

An amendment proposed to scrap this text. A majority of MEPs rejected the amendment, but many still supported it.

Is concerned about the hate speech and violence taught in Palestinian school textbooks and used in schools by UNRWA in in the West Bank, Gaza Strip and East Jerusalem; is concerned about the effectiveness of UNRWA’s mechanisms of adherence to UN values in educational materials used and taught by UNRWA staff in its schools, which contain hate speech and incitement to violence; insists that UNRWA acts in full transparency and publishes in an open-source platform all its educational materials for teachers and students, as well as its reviews of host country textbooks used to ensure that content adheres to UN values and does not encourage hatred; requests that all school material, which is not in compliance with these standards be removed immediately; insists that the earmarking of EU funding such as PEGASE for salaries paid to teachers and public servants in the education sector must be made conditional on educational material and course content complying with UNESCO standards of peace, tolerance, coexistence, and non-violence, as was decided upon by Union education ministers in Paris on 17 March 2015;

VOTE NR 6 on allowing the European Court of Auditors to audit all operations by the European Investment Bank

Reference: 2019 Discharge: EU general budget – Commission and executive agencies Paragraph 482/1

A majority of MEPs voted to support the following proposal:

Considering that the EIB, a major player in the implementation of Union external policies, with 10 % of its loans outside the Union, plans to strengthen its development role by creating a dedicated agency for this purpose and may become the main entity in charge of development policies in the new financial architecture framework of the Union, reiterates the longstanding demands of the Parliament that the Court be empowered to audit all EIB operations, and that these audits be carried out;

VOTE NR 7 on approving EU 2019 spending

Reference: 2019 Discharge: EU general budget – Commission and executive agencies vote: resolution

A majority of MEPs voted to approve (or “grant discharge to”) EU 2019 spending. This despite the fact that the EU’s own auditing body, the European Court of Auditors, did “conclude that payments were affected by too many errors, mainly in the category classified as ‘high risk expenditure’”. It did say EU accounts were giving “a true and fair view” of the EU’s financial position.

For years, the European Court of Auditors, has been issuing very critical assessments of EU spending, even if the situation has improved in recent years.

There’s also the issue of the EU’s “debt” or “reste à liquider”: Even if the EU is not legally allowed to go into debt, it has built up a mountain of “unpaid bills”, amounting to almost twice the EU’s annual budget. Since 2011, this has increased with 36 percent and the European Commission expects it to rise further, to 313 billion euro in 2023, something the European Court of Auditors has also warned about.

Furthermore, severe weaknesses persist in the way the EU budget is spent, when it comes to EU agricultural, regional or administrative spending, with concerns of these funds propping up organized crime, oligarchs and vested interests, something which for example in Bulgaria led to mass protests and a big election defeat of the incumbent government. The European Commission resists making its “spending reviews” public whereby it looks at the efficiency of every spending programme, despite this being requested by the likes of the Dutch government.

Despite all of this, a majority of MEPs happily sign off EU spending without asking many questions.

VOTE NR 8 on examining EU spending the year after EU funds are spent and not two years after, to strengthen scrutiny

Reference: 2019 Discharge: EU general budget – European Parliament Amendment 1

A majority of MEPs rejected the following proposal to examine EU spending the year after EU funds are spent and not two years after, to strengthen scrutiny:

“1 a. Notes with concern that the European institutions are once again failing to have a budgetary discharge in the year following the year under review; stresses that the current procedure of examining the accounts two years later is contrary to transparency and sound management of public money; is concerned that, as a result, the recommendations made to correct the errors and malfunctions detected for the year N will only be implemented during year N+2”

VOTE NR 9 on whether taxpayers should pay for the European Parliament’s secretive second pension fund in case it suffers investment losses

Reference: 2019 Discharge: EU general budget – European Parliament Amendment 17D https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2021-0044-AM-009-018_EN.docx

The European Parliament’s second pension fund is no longer open to MEPs that were not already an MEP before 2009, but the controversial scheme, which has been established in Luxembourg, so to guarantee secrecy, continues to pay out to mostly former MEPs and their family members. In case the investment fund suffers losses, it is currently foreseen that taxpayers need to pay for these losses, as a guaranteed return has been promised.

III. Subsidiarity (4 votes):

VOTE NR 12 on whether Brexit should inspire subsidiarity reform of the EU

Reference: The outcome of EU-UK negotiations Amendment 5

MEPs were asked to vote on this:

“Considers that the UK’s withdrawal could inspire a reform of the EU, towards greater respect for the sovereign interests of the Member States;”

A majority voted against this.

VOTE NR 13 on immediate EU action to agree an EU digital services tax regardless of the progress at the global level

Reference: Digital taxation: OECD negotiations, tax residency of digital companies and a possible European Digital Tax vote: resolution (as a whole) https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2021-0103_EN.html

A majority of MEPs voted to support “immediate EU action” to agree an “EU digital services tax”, backing a resolution outlining that “regardless of the progress of the negotiations in the G20/OECD IF, the EU should have a fall-back position and stand ready to roll out its own proposal for taxing the digital economy by the end of 2021”.

Apart from the fact that taxing digital services is not exactly the right incentive to support digital innovation, something where the EU is lagging its competitors, also since the introduction of burdensome GDPR regulations, dictating the kind of taxes that should be in force in EU member states is a clear violation of the principle of subsidiarity and flies against the perspective of BrusselsReport.eu that the EU should be focusing on its core business, which is to scrap barriers to trade.

VOTE NR 14 on EU spending on “reducing the digital divide”

Reference: European Child Guarantee Paragraph 16/2

With this vote, a majority of MEPs are supporting “calls for a public-private partnership at pan-European level for investing in reducing the digital divide and empowering children through digital and entrepreneurial skills”

While “reducing the digital divide” is obviously a laudable aim, using the EU budget for this is a violation of the subsidiarity principle, given that there is no relationship with the EU’s core business to open up trade.

VOTE NR 15 on EU spending on “technological upgrading and comprehensive digital training”

Reference: European Child Guarantee Paragraph 16/3

With this vote, a majority of the the European Parliament “stresses the importance of equal access to digital infrastructure and skills for children, teachers and parents alike, in both urban and rural settings, in order to avoid a digital divide, as well for children in remote and outlying regions; calls on the Commission and the Member States to provide financial support to areas in need of technological upgrading and comprehensive digital training for both teachers and students, in order to enable them to adapt to new technologies;”

While everyone should be in favour of “technological upgrading and comprehensive digital training”, using the EU budget for this is a violation of the subsidiarity principle, certainly when it comes to education, given that there is no relationship with the EU’s core business to open up trade.

IV. Civil liberties (1 vote):

VOTE NR 16 on whether to oppose an EU “Vaccine Passport”

Reference: Digital Green Certificate – Union citizens Amendment 11

https://www.votewatch.eu/en/term9-digital-green-certificate-union-citizens-draft-legislative-resolution-rejection-amendment-11.html

With this vote, MEPs were asked to vote on an amendment rejecting the so-called “Digital Green Certificate”, also known as the “Vaccine Passport” for EU travel. Opponents, like the “Civil Liberties Union for Europe”, an EU-focused human rights watchdog, have pointed out that the scheme may “create a divide between citizens of different EU countries”, adding:

“[There are] inevitably risks to travellers’ privacy if the vaccine certificate is in digital form. Governments won’t only have to ensure that they keep individuals’ data safe, but also that this is not shared or misused for other purposes. If the vaccination certificate is required for travel between countries, it means all 27 governments have to have interoperable systems with equally strong data protection systems. And the EU data protection chief already expressed scepticism about the feasibility of this.”

Furthermore, EU legal expert Ciarán McCollum has warned that the scheme may lead to “checks within the Schengen zone. It is article 3 of the DGC that creates certificates of vaccination, testing and immunity. Border guards will have to inspect these.”

On BrusselsReport.eu, Bill Wirtz has pointed out:

“It could become mandatory to present it when entering a grocery store, a concert venue, or a park…it is concerning that the EU vaccine passport exposes sensitive health information – concerning vaccination, test results and even medical information on being recovered from Covid – to hackers, domestic and from foreign governments…It very much looks like this may become a long-term measure, whereby an increasing amount of personal information is being gathered under the pretext of public health and security.”

This is what amendment 11, submitted by MEPs opposing the scheme, argued:

“The proposed regulation infringes on fundamental human rights, including freedom of movement, respect of private life, protection of personal data and equality before the law. It also results in discrimination against those who have not had the opportunity or do not wish to be vaccinated or to be tested. Moreover, it does not guarantee data privacy protection. Sharing of personal and medical data should never be compulsory and storing of this confidential information is not necessary. Furthermore, it will most likely be used for other purposes besides restricting the freedom of movement and it poses a risk to become permanent since it will be applicable to any variant of SARS-CoV-2 and similar infectious diseases with epidemic potential. The Commission has also not conducted an impact assessment. The regulation has such far-reaching implications for fundamental rights, that an impact assessment cannot be omitted in light of an urgency. Finally, this regulation is not necessary to ensure the freedom of movement. Presenting the results of a negative PCR-test before cross border travel is sufficient. The proposed regulation should therefore be rejected in its entirety.”

Nevertheless, the European Parliament vote to simply go along with the EU’s “vaccine passport”, as 591 MEPs rejected this amendment critical of this “Digital Green Certificate”, with only 86 MEPs supporting it and 16 abstaining.

V. Free market economics (2 votes)

VOTES NR 17 and NR 18 on whether to scrap Covid vaccine patents retroactively

With vote nr. 17, MEPs were asked to vote on the following amendment, proposing to scrap Covid vaccine patents:

“The Union should support the India and South Africa WTO initiative for a temporary waiver of intellectual property rights with regard to COVID-19 vaccines and treatments and the pharmaceutical companies should share their knowledge and data through the WHO’s COVID-19 Technology Access Pool (C-TAP).” (Reference: Digital Green Certificate – Union citizens Amendment 20rev)

With vote nr 18, they were asked whether they “deplore the repeated refusal of EU Member States to accept the proposals being put forward by India, South Africa and others at the WTO calling for the waiving of monopolies for COVID-19 medical tools considering the current state of emergency, which is one of the criteria for the waiving of patents under existing WTO rules” (Reference: EU-India relations Amendment 11)

Because of the importance of this issue, 2 votes relating to this matter have been selected to rank MEPs. Thankfully, when it comes to vote nr. 17, a majority of 454 MEPs voted to reject this attack on the market system, but still 162 supported it. Despite the fact that pharma companies managed to come up with life-saving Covid vaccines at a speed that few had assumed possible, they are now threatened with retroactive expropriation of their innovation, which is also of gigantic economic importance. The argument that taxpayers resources have been used to develop these vaccines does not hold water, as the research necessary to develop has been conducted over decades and not since governments have been financially supporting pharma innovators to come up Covid vaccines.

Not only may undermining vaccines threaten both innovation and the EU’s economy, as 82% of all EU exports is generated by sectors dependent on intellectual property, it is not likely to have much of an effect on actually boosting vaccine production, given how complex it is to produce these new vaccines. Apart from the importance to preserve future innovation, this is yet more evidence how vital the importance of cooperation with private industry really is.

THE RANKING:

Here are the five best performing MEPs:

Jessica STEGRUD (Sweden, ECR)
Charlie WEIMERS (Sweden, ECR)
Peter LUNDGREN (Sweden, ECR)
Robert ROOS (The Netherlands, ECR)
Rob ROOKEN (The Netherlands, ECR)

And the five worst performing MEPs:

Paolo DE CASTRO (Italy, S&D)
María Soraya RODRÍGUEZ RAMOS (Spain, Renew)
Billy KELLEHER (Ireland, Renew)
Rovana PLUMB (Romania, S&D)
Claudiu MANDA (Romania, S&D)

The full ranking can be found by clicking at the following links:

– Excel file with the full ranking: Brussels Report MEP Ranking May 2021

– Excel file with the precise information on the votes and an overview on how each MEP has been voting on each of the 18 selected votes: How Individual MEPs voted and Vote Selection – MEP ranking Brussels Report18052021. Voting along the lines of the Brussels Report perspective is marked in green. Voting the other way, in red.

Analysis:

By Pieter Cleppe, editor of BrusselsReport.eu

The relatively low weight to free market economics, with only 2 out of 18 votes, cannot serve as an excuse for the fact that many S&D MEPs have ended up quite low on this ranking.

The equally relative low weight to subsidiarity, with only 4 out of 18 votes, can also not serve as an excuse for the fact that many Renew MEPs (which tend to ideologically support more power for the EU level) perform rather poorly as well.

11 out of 18 votes relate to either financial transparency (2) or financial accountability (9), which are matters that every MEP should support. The top spots of this ranking are all composed of eurosceptics from various backgrounds. Those with a more “federalist” vision of the EU should make an effort to be as critical as their eurosceptic colleagues when it comes to voting on financial transparency and financial accountability topics.

In an ideal world, the European Parliament should serve as a check on the EU machine. This ranking reveals that we are a long way off from that.

— BRUSSELSREPORT.EU MEP RANKING MAY 2021 —

Data Analysis by Votewatch Europe:

NAME	Country	EP GROUP	Net score	Participation in EP plenary since 2019 (%)
Jessica STEGRUD	Sweden	ECR	17	98.35
Charlie WEIMERS	Sweden	ECR	17	95.94
Peter LUNDGREN	Sweden	ECR	15	98.76
Robert ROOS	Netherlands	ECR	14	98.69
Rob ROOKEN	Netherlands	ECR	14	97.21
Michiel HOOGEVEEN	Netherlands	ECR	14
Tom VANDENDRIESSCHE	Belgium	IDG	13	99.58
Filip DE MAN	Belgium	IDG	12	95.44
Gerolf ANNEMANS	Belgium	IDG	12	91.38
Margarita DE LA PISA CARRIÓN	Spain	ECR	11	99.98
Hermann TERTSCH	Spain	ECR	11	99.25
Mazaly AGUILAR	Spain	ECR	11	98.33
Jorge BUXADÉ VILLALBA	Spain	ECR	11	98.17
Peter KOFOD	Denmark	IDG	10	99.75
Jörg MEUTHEN	Germany	IDG	9	99.92
Joachim KUHS	Germany	IDG	9	99.82
Laura HUHTASAARI	Finland	IDG	9	99.76
Lars Patrick BERG	Germany	IDG	9	99.63
Nicolaus FEST	Germany	IDG	9	99.45
Gunnar BECK	Germany	IDG	9	99.17
Bernhard ZIMNIOK	Germany	IDG	9	98.57
Sylvia LIMMER	Germany	IDG	9	98.57
Guido REIL	Germany	IDG	9	96.94
Markus BUCHHEIT	Germany	IDG	9	96.29
Christine ANDERSON	Germany	IDG	9	91.91
Mara BIZZOTTO	Italy	IDG	8	99.94
Rosanna CONTE	Italy	IDG	8	99.9
Marco CAMPOMENOSI	Italy	IDG	8	99.87
Stefania ZAMBELLI	Italy	IDG	8	99.83
Gianantonio DA RE	Italy	IDG	8	99.83
Matteo ADINOLFI	Italy	IDG	8	99.82
Elena LIZZI	Italy	IDG	8	99.82
Danilo Oscar LANCINI	Italy	IDG	8	99.8
Marco DREOSTO	Italy	IDG	8	99.8
Susanna CECCARDI	Italy	IDG	8	99.8
Francesca DONATO	Italy	IDG	8	99.74
Annalisa TARDINO	Italy	IDG	8	99.72
Paolo BORCHIA	Italy	IDG	8	99.72
Roman HAIDER	Austria	IDG	8	99.69
Harald VILIMSKY	Austria	IDG	8	99.62
Lucia VUOLO	Italy	IDG	8	99.43
Marco ZANNI	Italy	IDG	8	99.41
Isabella TOVAGLIERI	Italy	IDG	8	99.37
Alessandro PANZA	Italy	IDG	8	99.37
Georg MAYER	Austria	IDG	8	99.1
Simona BALDASSARRE	Italy	IDG	8	98.9
Alessandra BASSO	Italy	IDG	8	98.79
Antonio Maria RINALDI	Italy	IDG	8	98.65
Massimo CASANOVA	Italy	IDG	8	98.36
Gianna GANCIA	Italy	IDG	8	98.07
Silvia SARDONE	Italy	IDG	8	97.9
Luisa Renew IMENTI	Italy	IDG	8	97.63
Dorien ROOKMAKER	Netherlands	NI	8	96.76
Anna BONFRISCO	Italy	IDG	8	96.43
Hynek BLAŠKO	Czech Republic	IDG	8	96.05
Angelo CIOCCA	Italy	IDG	8	95.71
Emmanouil FRAGKOS	Greece	ECR	7	97.42
Miroslav RADAČOVSKÝ	Slovakia	NI	7	94.82
Maximilian KRAH	Germany	IDG	7	91.72
Teuvo HAKKARAINEN	Finland	IDG	7	89.36
Bert-Jan RUISSEN	Netherlands	ECR	6	99.42
Valdemar TOMAŠEVSKI	Lithuania	ECR	6	98.42
Jan ZAHRADIL	Czech Republic	ECR	6	96.95
Milan UHRÍK	Slovakia	NI	6	95.95
Marcel de GRAAFF	Netherlands	IDG	6	95.26
Veronika VRECIONOVÁ	Czech Republic	ECR	5	99.7
Evžen TOŠENOVSKÝ	Czech Republic	ECR	5	99.29
Gilles LEBRETON	France	IDG	5	99.18
Andrey SLABAKOV	Bulgaria	ECR	5	98.93
Elżbieta KRUK	Poland	ECR	5	98.8
Jérôme RIVIÈRE	France	IDG	5	98.24
Hélène LAPORTE	France	IDG	5	98.19
Dominique BILDE	France	IDG	5	98.18
Mathilde ANDROUËT	France	IDG	5	98.12
Thierry MARIANI	France	IDG	5	98.11
Catherine GRISET	France	IDG	5	98.08
France JAMET	France	IDG	5	97.78
Alexandr VONDRA	Czech Republic	ECR	5	97.77
Annika BRUNA	France	IDG	5	97.71
Jordan BARDELLA	France	IDG	5	97.6
Philippe OLIVIER	France	IDG	5	97.56
Nicolas BAY	France	IDG	5	97.47
Joëlle MÉLIN	France	IDG	5	96.73
Aurélia BEIGNEUX	France	IDG	5	96.54
Virginie JORON	France	IDG	5	96.3
Angel DZHAMBAZKI	Bulgaria	ECR	5	96.03
Pernille WEISS	Denmark	EPP	5	95.82
Ivan DAVID	Czech Republic	IDG	5	95.7
Jean-Lin LACAPELLE	France	IDG	5	95.7
Jean-François JALKH	France	IDG	5	95.12
Patryk JAKI	Poland	ECR	5	94.86
Jean-Paul GARRAUD	France	IDG	5	94.36
Gilbert COLLARD	France	IDG	5	92.21
Jaak MADISON	Estonia	IDG	5	92.08
Maxette PIRBAKAS	France	IDG	5	91.34
Herve JUVIN	France	IDG	5	90.14
Julie LECHANTEUX	France	IDG	5	90.11
Lefteris NIKOLAOU-ALAVANOS	Greece	NI	5	89.74
Kostas PAPADAKIS	Greece	NI	5	88.64
André ROUGÉ	France	IDG	5	70.62
Ernő SCHALLER-BAROSS	Hungary	NI	4	100
Valentino GRANT	Italy	IDG	4	99.87
Assita KANKO	Belgium	ECR	4	99.29
Andor DELI	Hungary	NI	4	99.27
Anna ZALEWSKA	Poland	ECR	4	99.25
Kinga GÁL	Hungary	NI	4	98.52
Edina TÓTH	Hungary	NI	4	98.52
Andrea BOCSKOR	Hungary	NI	4	98.49
Krzysztof JURGIEL	Poland	ECR	4	98.33
Enikő GYŐRI	Hungary	NI	4	98.17
Tamás DEUTSCH	Hungary	NI	4	97.59
Beata KEMPA	Poland	ECR	4	97.59
Geert BOURGEOIS	Belgium	ECR	4	97.38
Karol KARSKI	Poland	ECR	4	97.19
Johan VAN OVERTVELDT	Belgium	ECR	4	97.07
Esther de LANGE	Netherlands	EPP	4	97.04
András GYÜRK	Hungary	NI	4	96.97
Lívia JÁRÓKA	Hungary	NI	4	96.46
Ádám KÓSA	Hungary	NI	4	93.71
László TRÓCSÁNYI	Hungary	NI	4	92.96
Balázs HIDVÉGHI	Hungary	NI	4	85.88
Cristian TERHEŞ	Romania	ECR	4	81.57
Colm MARKEY	Ireland	EPP	3	100
Elżbieta RAFALSKA	Poland	ECR	3	99.99
Ruža TOMAŠIĆ	Croatia	ECR	3	99.96
Sergio BERLATO	Italy	ECR	3	99.92
Beata MAZUREK	Poland	ECR	3	99.89
Deirdre CLUNE	Ireland	EPP	3	99.86
Seán KELLY	Ireland	EPP	3	99.76
Kosma ZŁOTOWSKI	Poland	ECR	3	99.75
Frances FITZGERALD	Ireland	EPP	3	99.66
Zbigniew KUŹMIUK	Poland	ECR	3	99.55
Beata SZYDŁO	Poland	ECR	3	99.44
Anna FOTYGA	Poland	ECR	3	99.27
Ryszard CZARNECKI	Poland	ECR	3	99.23
Maria WALSH	Ireland	EPP	3	99.21
Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA	Poland	ECR	3	99.18
Bogdan RZOŃCA	Poland	ECR	3	98.9
Adam BIELAN	Poland	ECR	3	98.72
Jacek SARYUSZ-WOLSKI	Poland	ECR	3	98.66
Mislav KOLAKUŠIĆ	Croatia	NI	3	98.62
Dominik TARCZYŃSKI	Poland	ECR	3	98.2
Grzegorz TOBISZOWSKI	Poland	ECR	3	98.05
Witold Jan WASZCZYKOWSKI	Poland	ECR	3	97.84
Andżelika Anna MOŻDŻANOWSKA	Poland	ECR	3	97.73
Izabela-Helena KLOC	Poland	ECR	3	97.7
Tomasz Piotr PORĘBA	Poland	ECR	3	97.09
Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI	Poland	ECR	3	96.12
Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO	Poland	ECR	3	95.85
Zdzisław KRASNODĘBSKI	Poland	ECR	3	94.02
Sandra PEREIRA	Portugal	The Left	3	93.59
Joanna KOPCIŃSKA	Poland	ECR	3	90.66
João FERREIRA	Portugal	The Left	3	85.82
Vincenzo SOFO	Italy	ECR	2	99.97
Jeroen LENAERS	Netherlands	EPP	2	99.9
Nikolaj VILLUMSEN	Denmark	The Left	2	99.82
Aušra MALDEIKIENĖ	Lithuania	EPP	2	99.52
Arba KOKALARI	Sweden	EPP	2	99.42
Jörgen WARBORN	Sweden	EPP	2	99.2
Nicola PROCACCINI	Italy	ECR	2	99.17
Carlo FIDANZA	Italy	ECR	2	99.03
Tomas TOBÉ	Sweden	EPP	2	98.81
Roberts ZĪLE	Latvia	ECR	2	98.76
Raffaele STANCANELLI	Italy	ECR	2	98.72
Antonius MANDERS	Netherlands	EPP	2	98.15
Raffaele FITTO	Italy	ECR	2	98.11
Jens GIESEKE	Germany	EPP	2	97.36
Tom BERENDSEN	Netherlands	EPP	2	97.23
Pietro FIOCCHI	Italy	ECR	2	97.23
David LEGA	Sweden	EPP	2	96.68
Jessica POLFJÄRD	Sweden	EPP	2	96.23
Dace MELBĀRDE	Latvia	ECR	2	95.7
Annie SCHREIJER-PIERIK	Netherlands	EPP	2	94.33
Ivan Vilibor SINČIĆ	Croatia	NI	2	91
Sara SKYTTEDAL	Sweden	EPP	2	64.29
Miriam LEXMANN	Slovakia	EPP	1	99.98
Antonio TAJANI	Italy	EPP	1	99.84
Chris MACMANUS	Ireland	The Left	1	99.84
Eugen JURZYCA	Slovakia	ECR	1	99.66
Peter van DALEN	Netherlands	EPP	1	97.87
Nuno MELO	Portugal	EPP	1	95.34
Peter POLLÁK	Slovakia	EPP	1	93.72
György HÖLVÉNYI	Hungary	EPP	1	93.04
Athanasios KONSTANTINOU	Greece	NI	1	76.61
Tom VANDENKENDELAERE	Belgium	EPP	0	100
Christian SAGARTZ	Austria	EPP	0	99.92
Søren GADE	Denmark	Renew	0	99.89
Andrea CAROPPO	Italy	EPP	0	99.84
Lukas MANDL	Austria	EPP	0	99.82
Fabio Massimo CASTALDO	Italy	NI	0	99.8
Simone SCHMIEDTBAUER	Austria	EPP	0	99.77
Ivan ŠTEFANEC	Slovakia	EPP	0	99.77
Paulo RANGEL	Portugal	EPP	0	99.76
Angelika WINZIG	Austria	EPP	0	99.76
Vladimír BILČÍK	Slovakia	EPP	0	99.72
Alexander BERNHUBER	Austria	EPP	0	99.72
Maria da Graça CARVALHO	Portugal	EPP	0	99.7
Siegfried MUREŞAN	Romania	EPP	0	99.69
Lídia PEREIRA	Portugal	EPP	0	99.69
Markus FERBER	Germany	EPP	0	99.66
Barbara THALER	Austria	EPP	0	99.66
Tiziana BEGHIN	Italy	NI	0	99.62
Jarosław DUDA	Poland	EPP	0	99.56
Sandra KALNIETE	Latvia	EPP	0	99.55
Loránt VINCZE	Romania	EPP	0	99.52
Marion WALSMANN	Germany	EPP	0	99.51
Danuta Maria HÜBNER	Poland	EPP	0	99.49
Chiara GEMMA	Italy	NI	0	99.48
José Manuel FERNANDES	Portugal	EPP	0	99.44
David CASA	Malta	EPP	0	99.42
Mario FURORE	Italy	NI	0	99.41
Inese VAIDERE	Latvia	EPP	0	99.25
Traian BĂSESCU	Romania	EPP	0	99.14
Ewa KOPACZ	Poland	EPP	0	99.11
Lefteris CHRISTOFOROU	Cyprus	EPP	0	98.97
Iuliu WINKLER	Romania	EPP	0	98.9
Michaela ŠOJDROVÁ	Czech Republic	EPP	0	98.84
Asger CHRISTENSEN	Denmark	Renew	0	98.79
Christian DOLESCHAL	Germany	EPP	0	98.7
Hildegard BENTELE	Germany	EPP	0	98.69
Bartosz ARŁUKOWICZ	Poland	EPP	0	98.69
Daniela RONDINELLI	Italy	NI	0	98.6
Niclas HERBST	Germany	EPP	0	98.48
Radan KANEV	Bulgaria	EPP	0	98.43
Tomasz FRANKOWSKI	Poland	EPP	0	98.19
Roberta METSOLA	Malta	EPP	0	98.14
Linea SØGAARD-LIDELL	Denmark	Renew	0	98.1
Karlo RESSLER	Croatia	EPP	0	97.9
Morten LØKKEGAARD	Denmark	Renew	0	97.87
Peter LIESE	Germany	EPP	0	97.86
Adam JARUBAS	Poland	EPP	0	97.83
Laura FERRARA	Italy	NI	0	97.76
Dino GIARRUSSO	Italy	NI	0	97.64
Jiří POSPÍŠIL	Czech Republic	EPP	0	97.64
Romana TOMC	Slovenia	EPP	0	97.54
Sven SCHULZE	Germany	EPP	0	97.5
Álvaro AMARO	Portugal	EPP	0	97.26
Andrius KUBILIUS	Lithuania	EPP	0	97.21
Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA	Poland	EPP	0	97.02
Franc BOGOVIČ	Slovenia	EPP	0	97.02
Eugen TOMAC	Romania	EPP	0	96.85
Stefan BERGER	Germany	EPP	0	96.84
Rainer WIELAND	Germany	EPP	0	96.78
Sabrina PIGNEDOLI	Italy	NI	0	96.73
Radosław SIKORSKI	Poland	EPP	0	96.7
Petri SARVAMAA	Finland	EPP	0	96.19
Magdalena ADAMOWICZ	Poland	EPP	0	94.45
Cláudia MONTEIRO DE AGUIAR	Portugal	EPP	0	93.77
Jerzy BUZEK	Poland	EPP	0	93.76
Cristian-Silviu BUŞOI	Romania	EPP	0	92.69
Ioan-Rareş BOGDAN	Romania	EPP	0	91.25
Janina OCHOJSKA	Poland	EPP	0	66.41
Massimiliano SALINI	Italy	EPP	-1	99.96
Liudas MAŽYLIS	Lithuania	EPP	-1	99.87
François-Xavier BELLAMY	France	EPP	-1	99.86
Sabine VERHEYEN	Germany	EPP	-1	99.83
Luděk NIEDERMAYER	Czech Republic	EPP	-1	99.62
Krzysztof HETMAN	Poland	EPP	-1	99.42
David McALLISTER	Germany	EPP	-1	99.21
Dennis RADTKE	Germany	EPP	-1	99.18
Milan ZVER	Slovenia	EPP	-1	99.15
Sunčana GLAVAK	Croatia	EPP	-1	99.11
Isabella ADINOLFI	Italy	EPP	-1	98.94
Nora MEBAREK	France	S&D	-1	98.88
Vasile BLAGA	Romania	EPP	-1	98.76
Gheorghe FALCĂ	Romania	EPP	-1	98.65
Riho TERRAS	Estonia	EPP	-1	98.56
Herbert DORFMANN	Italy	EPP	-1	98.52
Janusz LEWANDOWSKI	Poland	EPP	-1	98.35
Giuseppe MILAZZO	Italy	EPP	-1	98.31
Fulvio MARTUSCIELLO	Italy	EPP	-1	98.26
Anja HAZEKAMP	Netherlands	The Left	-1	98.19
Tomislav SOKOL	Croatia	EPP	-1	98.02
Christian EHLER	Germany	EPP	-1	97.88
Salvatore DE MEO	Italy	EPP	-1	97.85
Mircea-Gheorghe HAVA	Romania	EPP	-1	97.73
Ljudmila NOVAK	Slovenia	EPP	-1	97.3
Peter JAHR	Germany	EPP	-1	97.08
Marlene MORTLER	Germany	EPP	-1	96.83
Markus PIEPER	Germany	EPP	-1	96.44
Aldo PATRICIELLO	Italy	EPP	-1	95.3
Henna VIRKKUNEN	Finland	EPP	-1	94.16
Lena DÜPONT	Germany	EPP	-1	93.07
Alexander ALEXANDROV YORDANOV	Bulgaria	EPP	-1	92.25
Helmut GEUKING	Germany	EPP	-1	82.5
Róża THUN UND HOHENSTEIN	Poland	EPP	-1	56.92
Marc BOTENGA	Belgium	The Left	-2	99.96
Johan DANIELSSON	Sweden	S&D	-2	99.94
Anne-Sophie PELLETIER	France	The Left	-2	99.87
Evin INCIR	Sweden	S&D	-2	99.8
Michal WIEZIK	Slovakia	EPP	-2	99.79
Heléne FRITZON	Sweden	S&D	-2	99.77
Dolors MONTSERRAT	Spain	EPP	-2	99.75
Daniel BUDA	Romania	EPP	-2	99.75
Arnaud DANJEAN	France	EPP	-2	99.7
Juan Ignacio ZOIDO ÁLVAREZ	Spain	EPP	-2	99.7
Nathalie COLIN-OESTERLÉ	France	EPP	-2	99.66
Eric ANDRIEU	France	S&D	-2	99.64
Eugenia RODRÍGUEZ PALOP	Spain	The Left	-2	99.63
Marian-Jean MARINESCU	Romania	EPP	-2	99.62
Francisco José MILLÁN MON	Spain	EPP	-2	99.62
Nadine MORANO	France	EPP	-2	99.6
Monika HOHLMEIER	Germany	EPP	-2	99.53
Jarosław KALINOWSKI	Poland	EPP	-2	99.53
Javier ZARZALEJOS	Spain	EPP	-2	99.46
Brice HORTEFEUX	France	EPP	-2	99.44
Manuel BOMPARD	France	The Left	-2	99.41
Miguel URBÁN CRESPO	Spain	The Left	-2	99.39
Idoia VILLANUEVA RUIZ	Spain	The Left	-2	99.39
Andrey NOVAKOV	Bulgaria	EPP	-2	99.37
Norbert LINS	Germany	EPP	-2	99.32
Vangelis MEIMARAKIS	Greece	EPP	-2	99.32
Anne SANDER	France	EPP	-2	99.24
Theodoros ZAGORAKIS	Greece	EPP	-2	99.21
Leopoldo LÓPEZ GIL	Spain	EPP	-2	99.21
Antonio LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE	Spain	EPP	-2	99.16
Andreas SCHWAB	Germany	EPP	-2	99.08
Daniel CASPARY	Germany	EPP	-2	99.04
Georgios KYRTSOS	Greece	EPP	-2	99.03
Malin BJÖRK	Sweden	The Left	-2	98.91
Loucas FOURLAS	Cyprus	EPP	-2	98.89
Pablo ARIAS ECHEVERRÍA	Spain	EPP	-2	98.73
Željana ZOVKO	Croatia	EPP	-2	98.59
Geoffroy DIDIER	France	EPP	-2	98.56
Gabriel MATO	Spain	EPP	-2	98.53
Isabel BENJUMEA BENJUMEA	Spain	EPP	-2	98.52
Anna-Michelle ASIMAKOPOULOU	Greece	EPP	-2	98.42
Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS	Spain	EPP	-2	98.35
Jytte GUTELAND	Sweden	S&D	-2	98.31
Martina MICHELS	Germany	The Left	-2	98.26
Axel VOSS	Germany	EPP	-2	98.17
Tomáš ZDECHOVSKÝ	Czech Republic	EPP	-2	98.02
Manolis KEFALOGIANNIS	Greece	EPP	-2	98.01
José Manuel GARCÍA-MARGALLO Y MARFIL	Spain	EPP	-2	97.88
Helmut SCHOLZ	Germany	The Left	-2	97.81
Eva MAYDELL	Bulgaria	EPP	-2	97.47
Maria SPYRAKI	Greece	EPP	-2	97.39
Rasa JUKNEVIČIENĖ	Lithuania	EPP	-2	97.07
Sven SIMON	Germany	EPP	-2	96.94
Jan OLBRYCHT	Poland	EPP	-2	96.77
Christine SCHNEIDER	Germany	EPP	-2	96.7
Andrzej HALICKI	Poland	EPP	-2	96.63
Agnès EVREN	France	EPP	-2	96.44
Rosa ESTARÀS FERRAGUT	Spain	EPP	-2	96.16
Elissavet VOZEMBERG-VRIONIDI	Greece	EPP	-2	96.09
Gheorghe-Vlad NISTOR	Romania	EPP	-2	95.75
Stelios KYMPOUROPOULOS	Greece	EPP	-2	95.61
Andrey KOVATCHEV	Bulgaria	EPP	-2	95.5
Pilar del CASTILLO VERA	Spain	EPP	-2	95.13
Dan-Ştefan MOTREANU	Romania	EPP	-2	94.38
Manfred WEBER	Germany	EPP	-2	94.21
Emil RADEV	Bulgaria	EPP	-2	94
Stanislav POLČÁK	Czech Republic	EPP	-2	93.09
Miapetra KUMPULA-NATRI	Finland	S&D	-2	92.62
Joachim SCHUSTER	Germany	S&D	-2	90
Cyrus ENGERER	Malta	S&D	-3	99.92
Liesje SCHREINEMACHER	Netherlands	Renew	-3	99.86
Cindy FRANSSEN	Belgium	EPP	-3	99.77
Leila CHAIBI	France	The Left	-3	99.77
Maria GRAPINI	Romania	S&D	-3	99.76
Sira Renew O	Spain	The Left	-3	99.73
Caroline NAGTEGAAL	Netherlands	Renew	-3	99.73
Erik BERGKVIST	Sweden	S&D	-3	99.73
Pernando BARRENA ARZA	Spain	The Left	-3	99.66
Josianne CUTAJAR	Malta	S&D	-3	99.65
Kateřina KONEČNÁ	Czech Republic	The Left	-3	99.48
Luke Ming FLANAGAN	Ireland	The Left	-3	99.04
Clare DALY	Ireland	The Left	-3	98.63
Özlem DEMIREL	Germany	The Left	-3	98.31
Asim ADEMOV	Bulgaria	EPP	-3	98.25
Alex AGIUS SALIBA	Malta	S&D	-3	98.21
Pierre LARROUTUROU	France	S&D	-3	98.14
Manon AUBRY	France	The Left	-3	97.98
Bart GROOTHUIS	Netherlands	Renew	-3	97.95
Emmanuel MAUREL	France	The Left	-3	97.83
Malik AZMANI	Netherlands	Renew	-3	97.62
Sylvie GUILLAUME	France	S&D	-3	97.22
Alfred SANT	Malta	S&D	-3	96.51
Tudor CIUHODARU	Romania	S&D	-3	96.08
Marc TARABELLA	Belgium	S&D	-3	95.89
Manu PINEDA	Spain	The Left	-3	95.12
Stasys JAKELIŪNAS	Lithuania	Greens/EFA	-3	95.03
Jan HUITEMA	Netherlands	Renew	-3	94.34
Bernd LANGE	Germany	S&D	-3	88.6
Martin SCHIRDEWAN	Germany	The Left	-3	81.32
Claude GRUFFAT	France	Greens/EFA	-4	100
Emma WIESNER	Sweden	Renew	-4	100
Olivier CHASTEL	Belgium	Renew	-4	99.96
Nicola DANTI	Italy	Renew	-4	99.94
Abir AL-SAHLANI	Sweden	Renew	-4	99.9
Valter FLEGO	Croatia	Renew	-4	99.86
Christel SCHALDEMOSE	Denmark	S&D	-4	99.83
Ignazio CORRAO	Italy	Greens/EFA	-4	99.82
Eleonora EVI	Italy	Greens/EFA	-4	99.82
Benoît BITEAU	France	Greens/EFA	-4	99.65
Marco ZULLO	Italy	Renew	-4	99.65
Younous OMARJEE	France	The Left	-4	99.65
Ralf SEEKATZ	Germany	EPP	-4	99.63
Niels FUGLSANG	Denmark	S&D	-4	99.63
Martin SONNEBORN	Germany	NI	-4	99.59
Piernicola PEDICINI	Italy	Greens/EFA	-4	99.58
Raphaël GLUCKSMANN	France	S&D	-4	99.56
Sándor RÓNAI	Hungary	S&D	-4	99.53
Lucia ĎURIŠ NICHOLSONOVÁ	Slovakia	ECR	-4	99.51
Attila ARA-KOVÁCS	Hungary	S&D	-4	99.13
Rosa D’AMATO	Italy	Greens/EFA	-4	98.57
Robert HAJŠEL	Slovakia	S&D	-4	98.49
Benoît LUTGEN	Belgium	EPP	-4	98.31
Giorgos GEORGIOU	Cyprus	The Left	-4	98.29
Ernest URTASUN	Spain	Greens/EFA	-4	98.26
Nico SEMSROTT	Germany	Greens/EFA	-4	98.26
Csaba MOLNÁR	Hungary	S&D	-4	98.22
Michael GAHLER	Germany	EPP	-4	98.12
Sara MATTHIEU	Belgium	Greens/EFA	-4	97.87
Marianne VIND	Denmark	S&D	-4	97.71
Kim VAN SPARRENTAK	Netherlands	Greens/EFA	-4	97.57
Katarina BARLEY	Germany	S&D	-4	97.57
Frédérique RIES	Belgium	Renew	-4	97.56
Klára DOBREV	Hungary	S&D	-4	97.53
Marisa MATIAS	Portugal	The Left	-4	96.82
Claudia GAMON	Austria	Renew	-4	96.73
Guy VERHOFSTADT	Belgium	Renew	-4	96.44
Niyazi KIZILYÜREK	Cyprus	The Left	-4	96.12
Michèle RIVASI	France	Greens/EFA	-4	95.95
Alexandra GEESE	Germany	Greens/EFA	-4	95.51
Márton GYÖNGYÖSI	Hungary	NI	-4	95.4
Silvia MODIG	Finland	The Left	-4	95.3
José GUSMÃO	Portugal	The Left	-4	94.58
Ivo HRISTOV	Bulgaria	S&D	-4	93.06
Adrián VÁZQUEZ LÁZARA	Spain	Renew	-5	100
Alin MITUȚA	Romania	Renew	-5	100
Pär HOLMGREN	Sweden	Greens/EFA	-5	99.94
Samira RAFAELA	Netherlands	Renew	-5	99.9
Alice KUHNKE	Sweden	Greens/EFA	-5	99.87
Christophe HANSEN	Luxembourg	EPP	-5	99.84
Karin KARLSBRO	Sweden	Renew	-5	99.84
Jordi CAÑAS	Spain	Renew	-5	99.83
Sophia IN ‘T VELD	Netherlands	Renew	-5	99.8
Evelyn Renew NER	Austria	S&D	-5	99.8
Maite PAGAZAURTUNDÚA	Spain	Renew	-5	99.75
Isabel WISELER-LIMA	Luxembourg	EPP	-5	99.75
Lara WOLTERS	Netherlands	S&D	-5	99.73
Sven MIKSER	Estonia	S&D	-5	99.7
Włodzimierz CIMOSZEWICZ	Poland	S&D	-5	99.69
Milan BRGLEZ	Slovenia	S&D	-5	99.65
Susana SOLÍS PÉREZ	Spain	Renew	-5	99.65
Kathleen VAN BREMPT	Belgium	S&D	-5	99.6
Hannes HEIDE	Austria	S&D	-5	99.59
Pascal ARIMONT	Belgium	EPP	-5	99.56
Radka MAXOVÁ	Czech Republic	S&D	-5	99.52
Andreas SCHIEDER	Austria	S&D	-5	99.45
Pedro SILVA PEREIRA	Portugal	S&D	-5	99.39
Engin EROGLU	Germany	Renew	-5	99.1
Robert BIEDROŃ	Poland	S&D	-5	99.08
Gabriele BISCHOFF	Germany	S&D	-5	99.05
José Ramón BAUZÁ DÍAZ	Spain	Renew	-5	99.01
Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ	Spain	S&D	-5	99
Manuel PIZARRO	Portugal	S&D	-5	98.94
Marek Paweł BALT	Poland	S&D	-5	98.9
Vera TAX	Netherlands	S&D	-5	98.87
Grace O’SULLIVAN	Ireland	Greens/EFA	-5	98.81
Aurore LALUCQ	France	S&D	-5	98.76
Łukasz KOHUT	Poland	S&D	-5	98.7
Ciarán CUFFE	Ireland	Greens/EFA	-5	98.56
Michal ŠIMEČKA	Slovakia	Renew	-5	98.46
Maria ARENA	Belgium	S&D	-5	98.25
Isabel SANTOS	Portugal	S&D	-5	98.24
Cornelia ERNST	Germany	The Left	-5	98.19
Bettina VOLLATH	Austria	S&D	-5	98.1
Dragoș PÎSLARU	Romania	Renew	-5	97.97
Agnes JONGERIUS	Netherlands	S&D	-5	97.63
Juozas OLEKAS	Lithuania	S&D	-5	97.63
Delara BURKHARDT	Germany	S&D	-5	97.39
Evelyne GEBHARDT	Germany	S&D	-5	97.35
Marek BELKA	Poland	S&D	-5	97.22
Ramona STRUGARIU	Romania	Renew	-5	97.18
Paul TANG	Netherlands	S&D	-5	97.11
Leszek MILLER	Poland	S&D	-5	96.83
Nils UŠAKOVS	Latvia	S&D	-5	96.83
Nicolae ŞTEFĂNUȚĂ	Romania	Renew	-5	96.75
Vlad-Marius BOTOŞ	Romania	Renew	-5	96.7
Luis GARICANO	Spain	Renew	-5	96.66
Bogusław LIBERADZKI	Poland	S&D	-5	96.2
François ALFONSI	France	Greens/EFA	-5	96.2
Mick WALLACE	Ireland	The Left	-5	96.16
Elena YONCHEVA	Bulgaria	S&D	-5	96.13
Demetris PAPADAKIS	Cyprus	S&D	-5	95.96
Jakop G. DALUNDE	Sweden	Greens/EFA	-5	95.93
Petar VITANOV	Bulgaria	S&D	-5	95.74
István UJHELYI	Hungary	S&D	-5	95.63
Damien CARÊME	France	Greens/EFA	-5	95.63
Tsvetelina PENKOVA	Bulgaria	S&D	-5	95.56
Andris AMERIKS	Latvia	S&D	-5	95.26
Predrag Fred MATIĆ	Croatia	S&D	-5	95.15
Dacian CIOLOŞ	Romania	Renew	-5	94.95
Vilija BLINKEVIČIŪTĖ	Lithuania	S&D	-5	94.82
Günther SIDL	Austria	S&D	-5	94.79
Romana JERKOVIĆ	Croatia	S&D	-5	94.31
Sergei STANISHEV	Bulgaria	S&D	-5	94.19
Corina CREȚU	Romania	S&D	-5	94.1
Costas MAVRIDES	Cyprus	S&D	-5	93.68
Dragoş TUDORACHE	Romania	Renew	-5	93.4
Javier NART	Spain	Renew	-5	93.35
Eva KAILI	Greece	S&D	-5	92.82
Marina KALJURAND	Estonia	S&D	-5	92.78
Vlad GHEORGHE	Romania	Renew	-5	90.39
Norbert NEUSER	Germany	S&D	-5	90.02
Othmar KARAS	Austria	EPP	-5	90.02
Martin BUSCHMANN	Germany	NI	-5	85.33
Thijs REUTEN	Netherlands	S&D	-5
Manuela RIPA	Germany	Greens/EFA	-6	100
Ilana CICUREL	France	Renew	-6	99.98
Marcel KOLAJA	Czech Republic	Greens/EFA	-6	99.97
Stéphane SÉJOURNÉ	France	Renew	-6	99.97
Petras AUŠTREVIČIUS	Lithuania	Renew	-6	99.93
Clara PONSATÍ OBIOLS	Spain	NI	-6	99.92
Marie-Pierre VEDRENNE	France	Renew	-6	99.9
Dita CHARANZOVÁ	Czech Republic	Renew	-6	99.89
Izaskun BILBAO BARANDICA	Spain	Renew	-6	99.83
Marc ANGEL	Luxembourg	S&D	-6	99.8
Ondřej KOVAŘÍK	Czech Republic	Renew	-6	99.77
Rasmus ANDRESEN	Germany	Greens/EFA	-6	99.76
Atidzhe ALIEVA-VELI	Bulgaria	Renew	-6	99.76
Sylwia SPUREK	Poland	Greens/EFA	-6	99.75
Nicola BEER	Germany	Renew	-6	99.75
Chrysoula ZACHAROPOULOU	France	Renew	-6	99.7
Daniel FREUND	Germany	Greens/EFA	-6	99.69
Hilde VAUTMANS	Belgium	Renew	-6	99.69
Bronis ROPĖ	Lithuania	Greens/EFA	-6	99.68
Mohammed CHAHIM	Netherlands	S&D	-6	99.68
Francisco GUERREIRO	Portugal	Greens/EFA	-6	99.66
Irene TINAGLI	Italy	S&D	-6	99.66
Henrike HAHN	Germany	Greens/EFA	-6	99.64
Thomas WAITZ	Austria	Greens/EFA	-6	99.62
Katalin CSEH	Hungary	Renew	-6	99.62
Erik MARQUARDT	Germany	Greens/EFA	-6	99.59
Ivars IJABS	Latvia	Renew	-6	99.58
Petra KAMMEREVERT	Germany	S&D	-6	99.53
Philippe LAMBERTS	Belgium	Greens/EFA	-6	99.52
Martin HLAVÁČEK	Czech Republic	Renew	-6	99.52
Biljana BORZAN	Croatia	S&D	-6	99.49
Ulrike MÜLLER	Germany	Renew	-6	99.49
Christophe GRUDLER	France	Renew	-6	99.44
Yannick JADOT	France	Greens/EFA	-6	99.41
Sylvie BRUNET	France	Renew	-6	99.41
Kira Marie PETER-HANSEN	Denmark	Greens/EFA	-6	99.38
Terry REINTKE	Germany	Greens/EFA	-6	99.37
Salima YENBOU	France	Greens/EFA	-6	99.37
Tilly METZ	Luxembourg	Greens/EFA	-6	99.35
Catherine CHABAUD	France	Renew	-6	99.31
Konstantinos ARVANITIS	Greece	The Left	-6	99.29
Pina PICIERNO	Italy	S&D	-6	99.28
Sven GIEGOLD	Germany	Greens/EFA	-6	99.27
Caterina CHINNICI	Italy	S&D	-6	99.25
Mauri PEKKARINEN	Finland	Renew	-6	99.18
Véronique TRILLET-LENOIR	France	Renew	-6	99.17
Fabienne KELLER	France	Renew	-6	99.11
Markéta GRenew OROVÁ	Czech Republic	Greens/EFA	-6	99.1
Pierrette HERZBERGER-FOFANA	Germany	Greens/EFA	-6	99.08
Pascal CANFIN	France	Renew	-6	99.07
Irena JOVEVA	Slovenia	Renew	-6	99.05
Monika VANA	Austria	Greens/EFA	-6	99.01
Dimitrios PAPADIMOULIS	Greece	The Left	-6	98.98
Mounir SATOURI	France	Greens/EFA	-6	98.94
Andreas GLÜCK	Germany	Renew	-6	98.93
Bernard GUETTA	France	Renew	-6	98.82
Alexis GEORGOULIS	Greece	The Left	-6	98.76
Angelika NIEBLER	Germany	EPP	-6	98.73
Sarah WIENER	Austria	Greens/EFA	-6	98.56
Katrin LANGENSIEPEN	Germany	Greens/EFA	-6	98.5
David CORMAND	France	Greens/EFA	-6	98.49
Jan-Christoph OETJEN	Germany	Renew	-6	98.42
Martina DLABAJOVÁ	Czech Republic	Renew	-6	98.39
Svenja HAHN	Germany	Renew	-6	98.35
Nils TORVALDS	Finland	Renew	-6	98.29
Morten PETERSEN	Denmark	Renew	-6	98.25
Valérie HAYER	France	Renew	-6	98.21
Elena KOUNTOURA	Greece	The Left	-6	98.21
Irène TOLLERET	France	Renew	-6	98.14
Antoni COMÍN I OLIVERES	Spain	NI	-6	98.07
Ska KELLER	Germany	Greens/EFA	-6	98.05
Ville NIINISTÖ	Finland	Greens/EFA	-6	98.02
Jutta PAULUS	Germany	Greens/EFA	-6	98
Monika BEŇOVÁ	Slovakia	S&D	-6	97.95
Anna DEPARNAY-GRUNENBERG	Germany	Greens/EFA	-6	97.93
Ilhan KYUCHYUK	Bulgaria	Renew	-6	97.86
Saskia BRICMONT	Belgium	Greens/EFA	-6	97.62
Karima DELLI	France	Greens/EFA	-6	97.57
Anna Júlia DONÁTH	Hungary	Renew	-6	97.49
Tatjana ŽDANOKA	Latvia	Greens/EFA	-6	97.47
Hannah NEUMANN	Germany	Greens/EFA	-6	97.33
Marie TOUSSAINT	France	Greens/EFA	-6	97.32
Bas EICKHOUT	Netherlands	Greens/EFA	-6	97.29
Ismail ERTUG	Germany	S&D	-6	97.28
Petros KOKKALIS	Greece	The Left	-6	97.18
Elsi KATAINEN	Finland	Renew	-6	97.12
Iskra MIHAYLOVA	Bulgaria	Renew	-6	97.09
Monica SEMEDO	Luxembourg	Renew	-6	97.01
Viola VON CRAMON-TAUBADEL	Germany	Greens/EFA	-6	96.89
Michael BLOSS	Germany	Greens/EFA	-6	96.81
Mikuláš PEKSA	Czech Republic	Greens/EFA	-6	96.3
Anna CAVAZZINI	Germany	Greens/EFA	-6	96.3
Maria NOICHL	Germany	S&D	-6	96.16
Martin HOJSÍK	Slovakia	Renew	-6	96.13
Stelios KOULOGLOU	Greece	The Left	-6	96.11
Heidi HAUTALA	Finland	Greens/EFA	-6	95.58
Diana RIBA I GINER	Spain	Greens/EFA	-6	95.51
Pierre KARLESKIND	France	Renew	-6	95.48
Reinhard BÜTIKOFER	Germany	Greens/EFA	-6	95.37
Margrete AUKEN	Denmark	Greens/EFA	-6	95.26
Miroslav ČÍŽ	Slovakia	S&D	-6	95.17
Nikos ANDROULAKIS	Greece	S&D	-6	94.54
Tineke STRIK	Netherlands	Greens/EFA	-6	94.47
Alviina ALAMETSÄ	Finland	Greens/EFA	-6	94.24
Giuliano PISAPIA	Italy	S&D	-6	93.51
Martin HÄUSLING	Germany	Greens/EFA	-6	93.37
Romeo FRANZ	Germany	Greens/EFA	-6	93.17
Viktor USPASKICH	Lithuania	NI	-6	92.82
Udo BULLMANN	Germany	S&D	-6	92.45
Birgit SIPPEL	Germany	S&D	-6	92.2
Andrea COZZOLINO	Italy	S&D	-6	91.9
Sergey LAGODINSKY	Germany	Greens/EFA	-6	90.66
Patrick BREYER	Germany	Greens/EFA	-6	90.63
Jens GEIER	Germany	S&D	-6	90.49
Constanze KREHL	Germany	S&D	-6	89.74
Niklas NIENASS	Germany	Greens/EFA	-6	85.78
Jordi SOLÉ	Spain	Greens/EFA	-6	72.07
Victor NEGRESCU	Romania	S&D	-7	99.98
Marcos ROS SEMPERE	Spain	S&D	-7	99.92
Brando BENIFEI	Italy	S&D	-7	99.84
Isabel GARCÍA MUÑOZ	Spain	S&D	-7	99.82
Alicia HOMS GINEL	Spain	S&D	-7	99.82
Clara AGUILERA	Spain	S&D	-7	99.77
Jonás FERNÁNDEZ	Spain	S&D	-7	99.73
César LUENA	Spain	S&D	-7	99.72
Domènec RUIZ DEVESA	Spain	S&D	-7	99.72
Carlos ZORRINHO	Portugal	S&D	-7	99.68
Alessandra MORETTI	Italy	S&D	-7	99.68
Isabel CARVALHAIS	Portugal	S&D	-7	99.62
Simona BONAFÈ	Italy	S&D	-7	99.55
Mihai TUDOSE	Romania	S&D	-7	99.49
Margarida MARQUES	Portugal	S&D	-7	99.48
Pietro BARTOLO	Italy	S&D	-7	99.48
Eider GARDIAZABAL RUBIAL	Spain	S&D	-7	99.44
Javier MORENO SÁNCHEZ	Spain	S&D	-7	99.44
Adriana MALDONADO LÓPEZ	Spain	S&D	-7	99.44
Juan Fernando LÓPEZ AGUILAR	Spain	S&D	-7	99.31
Maria-Manuel LEITÃO-MARQUES	Portugal	S&D	-7	99.29
Elisabetta GUALMINI	Italy	S&D	-7	99.2
Sara CERDAS	Portugal	S&D	-7	99.07
Pierfrancesco MAJORINO	Italy	S&D	-7	98.9
Gwendoline DELBOS-CORFIELD	France	Greens/EFA	-7	98.79
Nacho SÁNCHEZ AMOR	Spain	S&D	-7	98.76
Ondřej KNOTEK	Czech Republic	Renew	-7	98.76
Ibán GARCÍA DEL BLANCO	Spain	S&D	-7	98.66
Giuseppe FERRANDINO	Italy	S&D	-7	98.66
Javi LÓPEZ	Spain	S&D	-7	98.36
Pedro MARQUES	Portugal	S&D	-7	98.29
Patrizia TOIA	Italy	S&D	-7	98.25
Andrus ANSIP	Estonia	Renew	-7	98.19
Massimiliano SMERIGLIO	Italy	S&D	-7	98.08
Estrella DURÁ FERRANDIS	Spain	S&D	-7	98.02
Lina GÁLVEZ MUÑOZ	Spain	S&D	-7	97.9
Tanja FAJON	Slovenia	S&D	-7	97.9
Inma RODRÍGUEZ-PIÑERO	Spain	S&D	-7	97.66
Stéphane BIJOUX	France	Renew	-7	97.5
Urmas PAET	Estonia	Renew	-7	97.33
Moritz KÖRNER	Germany	Renew	-7	97.09
Nicolás GONZÁLEZ CASARES	Spain	S&D	-7	97.05
Tonino PICULA	Croatia	S&D	-7	96.94
Dietmar KÖSTER	Germany	S&D	-7	96.5
Cristina MAESTRE MARTÍN DE ALMAGRO	Spain	S&D	-7	96.02
Franco ROBERTI	Italy	S&D	-7	94.41
Sirpa PIETIKÄINEN	Finland	EPP	-7	93.52
Carlo CALENDA	Italy	S&D	-7	93.4
Mónica Silvana GONZÁLEZ	Spain	S&D	-7	93.24
Dominique RIQUET	France	Renew	-8	100
Gilles BOYER	France	Renew	-8	99.92
Laurence FARRENG	France	Renew	-8	99.87
Klemen GROŠELJ	Slovenia	Renew	-8	99.83
Jérémy DECERLE	France	Renew	-8	99.77
Caroline ROOSE	France	Greens/EFA	-8	99.76
Stéphanie YON-COURTIN	France	Renew	-8	99.61
Yana TOOM	Estonia	Renew	-8	99.55
Sandro GOZI	France	Renew	-8	99.54
Charles GOERENS	Luxembourg	Renew	-8	98.56
Karen MELCHIOR	Denmark	Renew	-8	98.42
Nathalie LOISEAU	France	Renew	-8	98.32
Carles PUIGDEMONT I CASAMAJÓ	Spain	NI	-8	98.05
Tiemo WÖLKEN	Germany	S&D	-8	97.87
Damian BOESELAGER	Germany	Greens/EFA	-8	94.09
Pascal DURAND	France	Renew	-9	99.82
Barry ANDREWS	Ireland	Renew	-9	99.67
Adrian-Dragoş BENEA	Romania	S&D	-9	98.77
Eero HEINÄLUOMA	Finland	S&D	-9	98.35
Dan NICA	Romania	S&D	-9	98.02
Carmen AVRAM	Romania	S&D	-9	97.94
Paolo DE CASTRO	Italy	S&D	-9	97.23
María Soraya RODRÍGUEZ RAMOS	Spain	Renew	-9	96.42
Billy KELLEHER	Ireland	Renew	-9	96.35
Rovana PLUMB	Romania	S&D	-9	95.3
Claudiu MANDA	Romania	S&D	-9	74.91

BrusselsReport.eu Ranking of Members of European Parliament

METHODOLOGY:

I. Financial transparency (2 votes)

II. Financial accountability (9 votes)

III. Subsidiarity (4 votes):

IV. Civil liberties (1 vote):

V. Free market economics (2 votes)

THE RANKING:

Analysis:

— BRUSSELSREPORT.EU MEP RANKING MAY 2021 —

Data Analysis by Votewatch Europe:

LATEST NEWS

The victory of the Dutch farmers’ party is a warning signal to the EU

Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) should be listed as a terrorist group

Should the EU Freeze Aid to Palestine?

MUST READ

Europe’s China debate is only getting started

The Brussels Report Podcast Episode 39 – with Philip Weiss

The social democratic legacy of Jacques Delors

EDITOR PICKS

Chile’s lessons for European welfare states

The Brussels Report Podcast Episode 39 – with Philip Weiss

What can the EU expect from a second Trump term?

POPULAR POSTS

This is what a future EU-UK relationship might look like

Mario Draghi’s dire legacy for the Eurozone

An assessment of Jean-Claude Juncker’s European Commission presidency

POPULAR CATEGORY